top of page
Search

Eggleston v. Wood

3 days ago
1 min read

2025 - Ohio - 5292 (Nov. 26, 2025) (Kennedy, C.J.)

Holding. Civ.R. 6(D) adds no days to the 14-day period for objecting to a mailed

magistrate’s decision, because Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) runs from filing and Civ.R. 6(D) reaches only periods running from service (¶ 1, 15-16).


Takeaways. Because the 14 days run from filing, counting from the file stamp and seeking any extension before day 14 may help avoid the late filing at issue here.

Recent Posts

See All
E.A.K.M. v. M.A.M.

2025 - Ohio - 2946 (Aug. 21, 2025) (DeWine, J.; Kennedy, C.J., concurring in judgment only) Holding. Finality is decided by category of order, and an interlocutory order to pay guardian ad litem fees

 
 
 
Sliding Doors

The Supreme Court of Ohio reversed the First District's remand order asking whether a same-sex couple 'would have been married' before Obergefell. P.S. bore three children through artificial inseminat

 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page